We are all panic buying.
The supermarkets, the government, the press are all agreed. We are panic
buying.
Faced with a lengthy lock-down, imposed and reinforced by the government,
people are thinking ahead and trying to make sure that they and their families
have provisions for the future.
Isn't this what the wise virgins did ? Or the meaning of Potiphar's dream
about the fat cows and thin cows ?
Making provision for the future is what people are usually expected to do,
if they want to be seen as responsible. Now, in the face of very real
shortages, and with little confidence in the government's ability to shape the
future, making that provision is seen as panic buying.
What's the other side of the story ? There are always two-sides, but only
one grabs the megaphone.
The stores depend on just-in-time deliveries. This works fine when
deliveries are carefully calculated to match the rhythms of normal life and the
pulse of shopping activity. But in the current global pandemic, shopping habits
changed more quickly that the supermarkets' algorithms. Result ? The supply
chains failed because the supermarkets were slow to act, and did not spot the
intensity of the impact of the virus.
Since Wuhan, the potential impact has been pretty clear, but the supply
chains did not react.
It's a cardinal rule. When something goes wrong, find someone to blame. And
of course, it is they public who are blame. They are not being suitably
cautious and fore-sighted. They are panic buying.
Gaslighting.
No comments:
Post a Comment